See one of the great political spoofs at the following link:
Huma Abedin is Hillary Clinton’s very attractive female aide, confidant, and with her nearly 24/7. For those who can phone Hillary directly, they know that no matter the hour, day or night, Huma will answer the phone. If she judges your call to be sufficiently important, Hillary will be on the phone minutes, if not seconds later, even at 2:00 am. Huma is the subject of rumours from both the right and LEFT. Yes, even the left. There are many Hillary-haters on the left also. Web site WorldNetDaily had a commentary about how the Clintons might undo John McCain, but went on to speculate that McCain supporters would fight back by outing Hillary’s bisexual, lesbian affair with Huma.
This story just won’t go away, that Larry Flynt has the dirt on a sitting Senator in a lesbian relationship. Apparently Larry keeps saying he has the story and plans to go to press. The LA Times is supposed to have the story also.
Does anyone know if this story has leggs, or is it just another net rumor?
Hillary Clinton lesbian gossip gets some fresh fuel over her stunning “traveling” chief-of-staff Huma Abedin.
Rumors have been circulating…that Hillary Clinton is having a lesbian affair. Her alleged paramour: a beautiful aide named Huma Abedin. As you can see from the photo, if Hillary is having an affair with Abedin it would not be evidence of her lesbianism as much as of her common sense and sound judgment.The hard-to-credit rumor of Hillary’s Sapphic excursions is being stoked by right-wing bloggers. They suggest that this supposed romance shows the candidate is not only a lesbian but consorting with terrorists, given that the Michigan-born Abedin is reportedly from a family brimming with known Muslims.
If Dan Rather had reported the Hillary & Huma lesbian lover affair, it would sound something like this, “The facts are false, but the story is true”, sort of like his story on Bush’s National Guard service.Is there a Democratic sex “scandal”–no matter how bogus–that Mickey Kaus won’t promote? Today he’s plugging (albeit in a somewhat passive aggressive fashion) the ridiculous rumor that Hillary Clinton is the lesbian lover of her aide Huma Abedin. Here’s my favorite bit of Kausian sophistry:Let’s assume what is likely to be the case–that the Huma rumor is a) unprovable if true and b) un-disprovable if untrue. Under the old rules that means it would never be proved and would probably never surface. If it did surface –say because it was the subject of vicious campaign push-polling–a simple denial by both parties and it would be semi-officially “false.” In the new Webby post-Lewinsky world it’s more likely to surface, which makes the subsequent denial all the more important. Contrary to popular belief, it’s not impossible to issue a denial so convincing that even gossip-addicted bloggers drop a juicy rumor. (Here’s an example.) The trouble for Hillary is that when it comes to sex rumors she and her husband (unlike, say, John Edwards and his wife) have no credibility. They threw that away when the philandering charges they righteously denounced in 1992 and 1998 turned out to be basically true.